I hear those two words often in
these difficult times. They’re often confused, and therefore misused. It’s
inaccurate to say “I’m a Luddite; computers scare the daylights out of me.”
Well, both statements may be true, but they’re not synonymous, and clumping
them together like that makes the non-sequitur
button go off. Nor is it redundant to say “I’m a technophobe; I wish I
could un-invent the computer.”
A
Luddite is someone who despises and would happily destroy (or un-invent) technology
that takes jobs away from people. The word comes from a movement in Northern
England during the early nineteenth century, just as the Industrial Revolution
was getting under way. The Luddites were Industrial Counterrevolutionaries who
smashed machinery that was replacing human labor in the textile and other
industries.
Modern
Luddism might refer to the inventors of computer worms and viruses; but as far
as I know those malevolent hackers don’t have a social agenda. They’re just
vandals, super-sophisticated versions of teenage boys who smash mailboxes with
baseball bats. To be a real Luddite, you must have a social agenda, and it has
to do with jobs. (Not Jobs.)
Technopobia
is fear of, or aversion to, advanced technology. The word “technophobe” generally
refers to someone who feels too dumb to master the techniques of personal
computer applications. The word sometimes has ageist overtones, implying that
the technophobe is a fuddy-duddy stuck in the era of the Model T. However, some
technophobes are proud of their reluctance to modernize their thinking, and
they mourn for the passing of such pre-computer niceties as handwritten
thank-you notes and the lovely printed volumes of the Encyclopædia Britannica. A true technophobe doesn’t buy anything
over the Internet, for fear someone will learn his mother’s maiden name and
move all his assets to Nigeria.
I
happen to have both Luddite and Technophobic tendencies. Yes, I have a
computer, and I use Wikipedia and Word and email. But it took me six difficult months
to learn what I know about the Word application, and I don’t want to learn one
more thing about it. I joined Facebook, but I don’t want to know how to share
photos. Forget Garage Band; I wasted two hours getting furious with myself and
with that complex, time-wasting toy. So, yes, I am a technophobe compared to my
genius children and grandchildren, whose fingers fly over their keyboards,
their iPads, their smart phones. Don’t try to sell me a smart phone, because
I’m not smart enough to figure out how it works, okay?
Am
I a Luddite? Well, I’ve never intentionally done damage to the Information
Highway, nor have I ever socked my monitor (though I’ve been tempted). So I’m a
nonviolent Luddite, although I know that’s an oxymoron. What’s my beef with digital
technology? It’s very much the same complaint the original Luddites had about
the machinery that replaced human labor in the Industrial Revolution. Computer
technology destroys jobs. Oh, sure, jobs open up in the field of digital
technology, but there are nowhere near as many jobs gained in that field as the
jobs lost or rendered obsolete in other parts of our economy, jobs that used to
keep the middle class solvent. Telephone receptionists. Secretaries. Number
crunchers sitting at desks punching adding machines all day. Travel agents.
Librarians. Clerks in record stores, camera stores, and bookstores. Postal
employees. And the list continues. Many of these jobs may have been humdrum,
but they paid a living wage. Some of these jobs may still exist, but in smaller
numbers.
Am
I sentimental and nostalgic? Yes. Am I sorry the Information Age came to be?
No. Do I use my personal computer? All the time. Can I imagine writing a novel
on a typewriter, and then retyping the whole 300-page manuscript over with
every revision? (I revise a lot.) No way. Yes, I use email, and sometimes I get
impatient when it takes a day to receive a response.
But
still. I mourn especially for the independent bookstore. There are only a
handful of them left. I worked in eight different indie stores during the 1960s
and 1970s, and I miss every one of them.
Sometimes
I live in the past. Well, that has come in handy over the past couple of years,
while I’ve been writing Hooperman, a
novel set in an independent bookstore in the summer of 1972. That was a time
before personal computers, before email, before voice mail, before Facebook, before
Amazon.com.
It’s
ironic that Hooperman is set in Palo
Alto, the birthplace of the Information Age. It’s also ironic that I’m using my
Mac, my blog, Facebook, and email to promote it. And it will be sold by Amazon,
as well as (I hope) independent bookstores.
Hooperman: A Bookstore Mystery will be published in November.
You’ll be hearing from me again about this…if you have a computer!
I'm glad you cleared up Luddites, never took the time to learn what it meant. I am by no means a technophobe, but neither am I proficient with today's technologies. I try to grasp the basics so I don't fall hopelessly behind knowing what people are talking about. Facebook helps with that when the younger, more agile-on-technology take the time to briefly fill me in. If I don't get it after a little work, I let it go.
ReplyDeleteI have to admit that I have Luddite tendencies whenever my computer doesn't "cooperate." But, like you, John, I don't know what I'd do without it.
ReplyDeleteAs one who grew up with the typewriter, went through numerous versions of computers and now trying to absorb the intricacies of Microsoft Version 8, I truly get what you say, John.
ReplyDeleteTHanks, Cora, Pat, and John. I would say we're on the same page, although the word "page" has a confused meaning in the computer age.
ReplyDeleteWell, I don't know. In general I embrace technology, open-mouthed, wondering what's next. Music - that's another matter. But my mother complained about Big Band music in the 40's. All noise, she said.
ReplyDeleteWhen they put a computer on my wife's desk, she got up and resigned her job.